Rule clarification (ahem)

irc.utchat.com #iPug

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:01 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:03 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby enochian » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:42 am

I disagree with Cy.

Repeated offences should be dealt with a lower margin for doubt and the penalty should also be harder.

Have a Low IQ and need an example? Fine. At the first offence u'll get banned at lets say 20 backshots and get 2h ban. Second offence 15 backshots and 6h ban, third offence at 10 backshots and 12h ban, Xth offence at 2nd backshot and 1 week ban.

Hard to keep track of repeated offences? we could have the bot handling the ban management (Shout out to Spydee and Paco!)
Last edited by enochian on Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
enochian
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 9:39 pm

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:44 am

I nominate you to be the counter.

Sounds like a good job for you. You can just watch my sexy ass all map.
Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby enochian » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:48 am

Image
enochian
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 9:39 pm

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby vitz^ » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:58 am

Image
User avatar
vitz^
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:49 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:09 am

Last edited by Aven on Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Cy » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:10 am

User avatar
Cy
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:13 pm
Location: GA

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby uenz » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:12 am

User avatar
uenz
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:05 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Morpheus » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:17 am



clearly needs some pt lol mixed into it
Image Image Sponsored by: Banko
User avatar
Morpheus
Robin
 
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:28 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:17 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby SJA94 » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:18 am

New forum (WIP)
User avatar
SJA94
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:37 pm
Location: England.

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby vitz^ » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:18 am

@ cy

i didnt receive any pm or things would have been looked into (if i was on). You cant say its bias cause admins are not here 24/7 to babysit the players. And since when aven gets banned everytime? theres at least 3 or 4 players who get banned way more often, for similiar offenses. And some of them have learnt their lesson already (hi edge).


@ aven

your point is barely valid, stats and several testimonies show you lamed the shit out of the pug. if thats not out of the ordinary for you thats another story. Next thing u are gona tell me is that tim and dawn are euros too.

get a fucking grip already.
Image
User avatar
vitz^
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:49 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:19 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby vitz^ » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:23 am

oooooo still so mad =(((((

#13 Laming. The amount of time that you will be banned will be proportionate to the extent of your laming.

Image


im done arguing with u, you are way too retarded.
Image
User avatar
vitz^
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:49 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Cy » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:25 am

User avatar
Cy
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:13 pm
Location: GA

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:26 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:28 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Dewsick » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:30 am

If I get banned for backshooting and barely doing anything wrong so should others. Justified ban.
There's been numerous amounts of occasions when I've complained to admins they people deserved bans for laming etc, I get it, why shouldn't others?
Backshooting is dumb. Anyone with a brain cell would realise that when you backshoot someone, they spawn back in base. I don't understand why people find the need to do it. This isn't a league game and pugs are meant to be FUN with hints of competitiveness.
If you're dumb enough to ruin other peoples fun (quotes from Humpty and PACO) then expect to be banned.
It's nice to see Vitz getting his hands dirty and other admins have been stepping up to the plate.
(23:04:46) holder › y shut up (23:04:47) holder › little bitch (23:05:00) vitrae › SRY (23:05:00) vitrae › BRO (23:05:04) vitrae › went to the kitchen (23:05:05) vitrae › get some (23:05:08) vitrae › glass of milk
Dewsick
Hans Moleman
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 6:27 pm

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:39 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby vitz^ » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:46 am

@ aven

im so sorry if im not 24/7 on babysitting the channel.

i have banned plenty of people for laming, most of them repeated offenders. you are just another one, dunno why so many tears.

as far as complaints go (from cy) havent received any. if you have a problem with how i do things u can talk with packo. A demotion would actually be a good favor for me - tired of dealing with retards like you ;)


dont stop putting wood in the fire tho :D you are amusing
Image
User avatar
vitz^
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:49 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Cy » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:48 am

User avatar
Cy
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:13 pm
Location: GA

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:50 am

Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Sauron » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:51 am

Spawnkilling offensive players is just as lame and pointless as backshooting them and that is precisely what Vitz, Uenz, and some other high fragging euros do constantly. They have the aim to not "backshoot" but they just kill or attempt to kill the opposing offense multiple times in a row for no particular reason other than to rack up frags. Take a random pug map uenz played....he has 131 total frags, killing the defense 59 times. That's not bad, but he killed the opposing offense 72 times. If you are going to talk about how backshooting is pointless, you have to talk about how killing the offense more than these people that are backshooting is just as pointless (due to spawn killing among other things). Have fun with the opposing offense respawning in their base (which is your objective to get to) 72 times.
Some of the people who do this are the same ones who whine incessantly if you backshoot them one time. They see no problem getting a monster kill off spawnkilling you and other offense for no reason (usually dying right after and accomplishing nothing because the entire enemy team is in the base with them), but as soon as you shoot them in the back they rage.
Image
User avatar
Sauron
Angus Gump
 
Posts: 1169
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:48 pm

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

Postby Aven » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:54 am

In addition - I find it quite humorous that you tout a clean environment, but you don't even use a swear filter.

Then again, that would just make you look worse because that's another rule you impose.

Lose/Lose - sorry about that.
Image Image
User avatar
Aven
Vargo Hoat
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:24 am

PreviousNext

Return to #iPug

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest