Page 1 of 5

Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:28 pm
by Aven
Here's little bitch under my boot, vitz, banning me because his little euro fuck bags lost;

14(2111:0911:3914) 14(11@158vitrae14) !tb Aven 12h lame :S
14(2111:0911:3914)  11-› ChanServ 11(-v+b11) Aven *!*@
14(2111:0911:3914)  11-› Aven was 4kicked by ChanServ 11((vitrae) lame :S11)

To be clear, I back shoot every pug, and every one knows it. These guys were absolutely furious, which brought quite the hilarity. So they lose, and start shit in irc. Me being the staunch defender, retaliated.

Since vitz currently sucks their dicks, he banned me for... laming? Since when is back shooting laming? Also, why isn't the whole channel banned?

Oh, right. That would be because vitz is a shit admin, with ops. He also doesn't like me and suffers from virginity and low IQ. He likes bubble baths and short dicks. He's an admin, and loves to flaunt it. He has premature balding, and bad teeth. Hands are currently in pants with finger on ban button.

If you see him - point, laugh, and shit on his ankle.

holla

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:40 pm
by uenz
since when is backshooting not laming?
just curious

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:52 pm
by Aven
That a serious question? Another euro...

As if I am the only one to ever do it. Vitz touts his zero tolerance racism, but what about discrimination?

It's fun to pick one and not the other.

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:54 pm
by vitz^
uuuh someone is mad, QQ more plz


like no one knows how u play like a faggot, totally going for the ass even if that means stop moving forward, u are awesome. plz refer to #ipugappeals for further tears.

PS: tim is euro, dawn is euro and flowx is my best friend.


some stats:


aven's offense on duku:

- 7 grabs and 1 pickup.
- 102 frags (29 on opposite defense and 73 on opposite offense, mostly in the back judging by the following logs)



02:58:17 › @Tim-_-: aven why were you backshooting the *entire* pug?
02:58:22 › +flowX: Aven chasing everyone and backshooting and actin like he know smtng about ctf..
02:58:23 › +DieselNOMIC: and now aven do it the same
02:58:24 › +riveN: cause he wants ban
02:58:26 › +Aven`: i back shoot every pug
02:58:54 › @Tim-_-: i let you guys on O go by me so many times
02:58:54 › +Aven`: back shooting is a ban?
02:59:02 › +Aven`: since when?
02:59:02 › @Tim-_-: only to shoot me in the back
02:59:08 › +Aven`: sure it does
02:59:09 › +faithless: it would be for me
02:59:10 › +Aven`: you just lost
02:59:11 › +faithless: lol
02:59:11 › +flowX: just seen someone walkin behind me and trying to chase


(...)


02:59:51 › +Aven`: ban for what?
02:59:52 › +Aven`: lol
02:59:52 › +jukebauer: jajaja
02:59:54 › +flowX: chasing?
02:59:56 › %enochian: for chasing
02:59:58 › +flowX: are u really that stupid?
02:59:58 › +flowX: wtf
02:59:59 › +Aven`: i back shot

03:00:03 › +flowX: u chased too
03:00:03 › +Aven`: like i do every pug
03:00:06 › @Tim-_-: let's have a vote
03:00:07 › +riveN: we told you 100 times
03:00:08 › @Tim-_-: ban aven?
03:00:13 › +flowX: yes
03:00:15 › +Bryan_: no
03:00:15 › +flowX: pls
03:00:16 › +riveN: yep
03:00:17 › +jukebauer: no
03:00:18 › +Bryan_: no
03:00:20 › +nppbx2: yes
03:00:22 › +riveN: YES

(...)

03:00:54      · · · Tim-_- (+b) *!*@kinslayer.user.globalgamers.net (F6: unban)
03:01:01      · · · +Aven` was kicked by Tim-_- (laming)
03:01:12 › +dawn`nomic: aven killed the pug
03:01:15 › +AnNiHiL4ToR: tim
03:01:15 › +dawn`nomic: tbh
03:01:21 › +flowX: kinda true
03:01:23 › %enochian: !atb Aven 12h
03:01:23 › +AnNiHiL4ToR: u cant ban him, if u were in the pug
03:01:24 › +flowX: duku was crap..
03:01:26 › +AnNiHiL4ToR: thats biased
03:01:38 › +dawn`nomic: told you before game
03:01:39 › +dawn`nomic: too
03:01:41 › +flowX: so everyone who want to play lame 1 game wait for his last game a day
03:01:44 › +flowX: and go for it
03:01:45 › @Tim-_-: i was only gonna kick him for 10 minutes
03:01:54 › +flowX: comes back next day and lame again^^
03:01:54      · · · vitrae (-b) *!*@kinslayer.user.globalgamers.net (F6: ban)

(...)

03:03:11 › @vitrae: every single pug same story :DDDDD
03:03:16 › +jukebauer: :$
03:03:17 › +flowX: ye
03:03:17 › @vitrae: we can vote on this
03:03:18 › +Aven`: ive prob accomplished more in this game than you ever will
03:03:22 › +Aven`: little bitch
03:03:25 › +dawn`nomic: vote?
03:03:30 › +dawn`nomic: theres no fucking vote
03:03:33 › %enochian: i vote ban
03:03:33 › @vitrae: BAN AVEN FOR LAMING? (vote with !yes or !no)
03:03:34 › +dawn`nomic: ban aven for killing the pug

(...)

03:03:44 › +Aven`: ban me, and i win
03:03:46 › +jukebauer: !no
03:03:48 › +dawn`nomic: who cares
03:03:50 › +Aven`: hahah
03:03:52 › +dawn`nomic: you fucking killed my fucking high
03:03:57 › +dawn`nomic: and wasted my fucking hour
03:04:05 › +dawn`nomic: and you talk shit after
03:04:10 › +dawn`nomic: like a dumb ass
03:04:10 › +Aven`: you had valiant effort
03:04:28 › +flowX: if i would need to chase and backshoot people 20mins to get 100 frags on duku
03:04:32 › @Tim-_-: it's different if someone does it occasionally when it's crucial to the game, but when you're doing it to obviously be a troll and try to ruin a pug, ban warranted imo
03:04:33 › +flowX: i would just play pokemon
03:04:52 › +flowX: indeed Tim-_-. at last thats how it should be
03:04:58 › @vitrae: result: BAN AVEN FOR LAMING? (yes: 3 - no: 1)

(...)

03:05:22 › +dawn`nomic: aven if i can change you can change lol
03:05:23 › @Tim-_-: you should hone your skills a bit more then Aven
03:05:44 › +Aven`: i have more skill than most in this channel, when i feel like it
03:05:49 › +Aven`: its been shown again and again
03:05:50 › +flowX: lmao
03:05:54 › @Tim-_-: anyway
03:05:55 › @Tim-_-: moving on

BONUS CONTENT:

03:07:10      · · · Query with Aven` ([email protected])
03:07:10      · · · Total querys: 2032 (~11.2 per day)
03:07:10 › Aven`: i win
03:07:17 › vitrae: yes
03:07:24 › vitrae: ur prize is a ban
03:07:28 › Aven`: just another example of bias
03:07:34 › Aven`: with your little euro friends
03:07:37 › vitrae: yes totally bias
03:07:38 › Aven`: all trash ctf players
03:07:40 › vitrae: tim is euro
03:07:45 › vitrae: and flowx is my best friend too
03:07:46 › Aven`: tim was in the pug
03:07:48 › vitrae: just stfu man
03:07:49 › Aven`: which makes him bias
03:07:53 › Aven`: go fuck yourself
03:07:55 › vitrae: like i dont know how u play pugs :D
03:07:56 › Aven`: how bout that
03:07:59 › vitrae: spare urself of it
03:08:00 › vitrae: ty
03:08:04 › Aven`: i didnt do anything i dont normally do
03:08:12 › Aven`: you werent even there
03:08:24 › vitrae: ye
03:08:26 › Aven`: hence, youre a little shit wielding irc power
03:08:32 › vitrae: so next time i will leave tim's ban without timer
03:08:34 › vitrae: for u
03:08:35 › vitrae: friend
03:08:36 › vitrae: good day
03:08:39 › Aven`: i dont give a fuck
03:10:18 › Aven`: i can easily get around this, you see =p
03:10:34 › Aven`: but i wont
03:10:44 › vitrae: whatever floats ur boat man
03:10:48 › Aven`: and when i play again
03:10:50 › vitrae: u do what u gota do
03:10:50 › Aven`: ill do the same thing
03:10:59 › vitrae: oki
03:11:04 › vitrae: good day sir
03:11:15 › Aven`: toodlez, nazi
03:11:24 › vitrae: AHAHAHAHAHAH4H4AH4H4H4H4L0L0L0LOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH4H4H4H4LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAH4H4AH4H4AH4H4H4H4LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAH4H4H4H4HAHAH4H4LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH4H4H4H4LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAHAH4H4H4H4HAHAHALOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAH4HAH4HA4H4H4HAHAL0L0L0LOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH4H4H4LOLOL0LOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAHAHAH4HAH4H4H4H4LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH4H4H4H4LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOAHAHAHAHAHAHAH4H4H4H4H4L0L0L0L0L0L0L0L04H4H4H4HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAL0L0L0L0L0L0L0L0AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAL0L0L0LOLOLOL0L0AHAH4H4H4H4H4H4H4H4H4H4L
03:11:30 › vitrae: ur funny :D
03:11:30      · · · No such nick (Aven`)


Image

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:57 pm
by PACO
It comes down to admin judgement. Certain players like kykas and aven earn a reputation for themselves. Don't like the reputation? Change your attitude/style of play.

Think the admins have poor judgement?


Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:04 pm
by Aven
Image

discrimination (dɪˌskrɪmɪˈneɪʃən) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]

— n
1. unfair treatment of a person, racial group, minority, etc; action based on prejudice

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:08 pm
by PACO
Consider yourself discriminated.. you have 12 hours to make some snazzy picket signs.

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:20 pm
by Aven
Oh I already counted on it.

May wanna adjust your rule set. I just hate pointing out all your flaws. :idea:

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:27 am
by Sauron

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:37 am
by Aven

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:43 am
by Sauron
With Dawn and FloX on the opposing team, I would bet 100000$ they were backshooting just as much as Aven.

[Deleted]

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:45 am
by csnafk
PostThis post was deleted by csnafk on Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:45 am.

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:47 am
by Aven

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:38 am
by PACO
Image

Image

http://www.globalunreal.com/utstats/?p=recent

15-30 pickups a day. The sky isn't falling, we're just taking out whatever trash accumulates... :S :S :S

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:06 am
by Aven
Fine and dandy when you make or break your own rules. I mean, let's come back to earth. You know I'm right. :arrow:

Patiently waiting for the 'cannot use dick while urinating' rule. In which case, I will take it and blacken vitz eye with it.

ROFL

Image

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:42 am
by Finalz
backshooting overall is retarded.
hi imma backshoot you in mid so you can spawn infront of me and killeds me so i cant grabs alot of flags, A+ CTF IQ

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:58 am
by TimTim

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:24 am
by Sonic|^
You want to stop people from using certain words, and now for playing a certain way? Is getting chased annoying? Yes, but it's not something that requires a ban. It's part of the game. So is 3, 4, and 5 D by the way. Stop trying to control everything. :roll:

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:30 am
by Sonic|^

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:12 am
by Sunny
excessive backshooting/laming has been part of the rules for a while and people who have done it get banned for it whenever it happens for the most part... jus gotta pm an @ :twisted:

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:25 am
by uenz

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:59 am
by vitz^
@ aven

no one has ever been banned for 1 or 2 backshots a map, or 1 or 2 chases a map (if ctf justifies it). However ask the likes of dawn, edge, anni and few other and you see what doing it excessively got them at times.

this is also not the first time i see people complaining about you, i guess you were in need of a timeout. Call it bias and cry some more, ur just like sauron - 2 crying little bitches doing a storm in a glass of water whenever something doesnt go their way.



and @ angus:

seems like you got trolled by bbz, maybe ask the person who banned you to ban bbz. stop wasting my time with useless shit and grow the fuck up, this isnt a 3rd grade class or pre-school. im not gona change your diaper. (neither will your team btw ..)


some logs:

(03:24:59) › Sauron`: [22:24:29] <Sauron`> bbz just went in server aliased as you
(03:24:59) › Sauron`: [22:24:31] <Sauron`> called dem a spic
(03:24:59) › Sauron`: [22:24:37] <Sauron`> he needs banned for 24h
(03:24:59) › Sauron`: [22:24:46] <Sauron`> ip: 74.91.116.230:7777
(03:24:59) › Sauron`: [22:25:43] <Sauron`> http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/7910/shot0027g.jpg
(03:25:00) › Sauron`: [22:26:08] <Sauron`> was american with 96 ping, and bbz is on. 99% certain it was him but server logs will confirm it
(03:25:04) › Sauron`: [22:26:14] <Sauron`> i expect that he will be banned for 24 hours
(03:25:15) › Sauron`: aliased as PACO
(03:25:32) › vitrae: dont expect that from me
(03:25:41) › vitrae: i didnt ban anyone for 24h
(03:25:44) › Sauron`: expect what? holding up the rules?
(03:25:46) › vitrae: let alone for a word
(03:25:54) › Sauron`: so you are ok if im banned for it
(03:25:56) › vitrae: i do however expect a good conduct from u
(03:25:58) › Sauron`: but wont ban anyone else
(03:25:58) › Sauron`: rofl
(03:26:00) › Sauron`: fuck you
(03:26:28) › vitrae: u rly think its ok to call nickelbacks and spics and then have any moral to talk about everything else?
(03:26:29) › vitrae: rotfl
(03:26:35) › vitrae: and yes fuck you too
(03:26:50) › vitrae: because as expected u cant talk without resorting to insulting
(03:27:11) › vitrae: so thx for proving my point on that stand


bbz 1-0 angus


im all done here, this is fucking waste of time.


regardz

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:11 am
by Sonic|^

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:13 am
by Cy
i'm sorry, but i'm going to have to agree with aven on this one. this is a completely unjust ban. just 2 days ago i was nig'd to all hell by dawn and windigo (mainly dawn) in a pug. it's laughable that dawn is actually complaining about backshooting.

there is definitely a bias in terms of bans handed out whether it's intentional/conscious or not. either start banning EVERYONE on a consistent basis or ban no one at all.

Re: Rule clarification (ahem)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:59 am
by Aven